Davis v. Strople
This text of 39 So. 2d 468 (Davis v. Strople) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Suit by Julia Davis Strople against Gladys Gwendolyn Davis and others to quiet title. From a final decree quieting title, the defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
We have here an appeal from a final decree quieting title. The sufficiency of the bill was before us in Davis v. Strople,
We are now asked to re-examine the bill and also to hold the evidence insufficient to sustain the decree. By reason of our previous decisions we will not now, a second time, consider whether the bill is sufficient. See Hunter v. Tyner,
We have duly considered the evidence and find no reason to hold the chancellor in error so the decree is affirmed.
Affirmed.
TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
BARNS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
HOBSON, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 So. 2d 468, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-strople-fla-1949.