Davis v. State.d

2017 Ark. 133
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 17, 2017
DocketCR-92-1385 & CR-00-528
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ark. 133 (Davis v. State.d) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. State.d, 2017 Ark. 133 (Ark. 2017).

Opinion

Cite as 2017 Ark. 133

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Nos. CR-92-1385 and CR-00-528

DON WILLIAM DAVIS Opinion Delivered April 17, 2017 APPELLANT

V.

DISSENTING OPINION. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice

I dissent from the majority’s decision today to take the matter as a case and stay Davis’s

execution. Davis’s mental competency is not at issue and the United States Supreme Court’s

action in McWilliams v. Dunn, 634 F. App’x 698 (11th Cir. 2015) likely has no bearing on

Davis’s case. The United States Supreme Court can enter a stay in Davis’s case if it deems it

appropriate. Accordingly, I dissent.

WOOD, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McWilliams v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
634 F. App'x 698 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ark. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-stated-ark-2017.