Davis v. State

167 S.W.2d 523, 145 Tex. Crim. 188, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 540
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 2, 1942·No. No. 22233·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This purports to be an appeal from a conviction for unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area, with a fine of $130.00 affixed as the punishment.

The record before us fails to reflect a final judgment in the case, in the absence of which this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Hellman v. State, 87 Tex. Cr. R. 460, 222 S. W. 980; Ellis v. State, 145 S. W. (2d) 176, 140 Tex. Cr. R. 339.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission- of Appeals has .-.been- considered’ by;the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court. •

[189]*189ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

For the reasons stated in Craig v. State, 22,817, this day decided, (Page 185 of this volume) the motion for rehearing is granted and the appeal is reinstated.

The appeal is based on the same grounds and the error found in the record is identical with that found in the Craig case. (See Watson v. State, 122 S. W. (2d) 311).

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 167 S.W.2d 523, 145 Tex. Crim. 188, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 540 (Tex. 1942).

167 S.W.2d 523 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trcka v. State
744 S.W.2d 677 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Johnson v. State
269 S.W.2d 393 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Mouton v. State
235 S.W.2d 645 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Tate v. State
220 S.W.2d 662 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)
McIntyre v. State
174 S.W.2d 732 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)