Davis v. State

77 S.W.2d 666, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 630

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Tex. Crim. 330 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 2, 1935·No. No. 17143·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of an aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for a term of sixty days.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals 'and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of an aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for a term of sixty days.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals 'and approved by the court.

Davis v. State, 77 S.W.2d 666, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 630 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

77 S.W.2d 666 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.