Davis v. State

272 S.W. 1116, 100 Tex. Crim. 422, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 511

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 Tex. Crim. 192 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 3, 1925·No. No. 9165.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Navarro County of forgery, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment charges the offense and is followed by the instructions given the jury.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Navarro County of forgery, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment charges the offense and is followed by the instructions given the jury.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Davis v. State, 272 S.W. 1116, 100 Tex. Crim. 422, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 511 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

272 S.W. 1116 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.