Davis v. State
174 S.W. 824, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 501
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 Tex. Crim. 37 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary. There is no statement of facts nor bills of exceptions. There is even no motion for new trial in the record. Therefore nothing is raised that can be reviewed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 174 S.W. 824, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 501 (Tex. 1915).
174 S.W. 824 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.