Davis v. State

1935 OK CR 68, 46 P.2d 1117, 57 Okla. Crim. 170, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 42

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 Okla. Crim. 411 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 7, 1935·No. No. A-8833.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of harboring a fugitive from justice and a person seeking to escape arrest for felonies committed within the state, and appeals.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on November 10, 1934. No brief has been filed in support of defendant’s assignment of errors.

*171 A careful examination of tbe record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. Tbe evidence is sufficient to support tbe verdict of the jury.

Tbe case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of harboring a fugitive from justice and a person seeking to escape arrest for felonies committed within the state, and appeals.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on November 10, 1934. No brief has been filed in support of defendant’s assignment of errors.

*171 A careful examination of tbe record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. Tbe evidence is sufficient to support tbe verdict of the jury.

Tbe case is therefore affirmed.

Davis v. State, 1935 OK CR 68, 46 P.2d 1117, 57 Okla. Crim. 170, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 42 (Okla. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

1935 OK CR 68 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.