Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Davis v. State

1909 OK CR 155, 105 P. 1118, 3 Okla. Crim. 246, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 251

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 1, 1909

DocketNo. A-385.

StatusPublished

This text of 1909 OK CR 155 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. State, 1909 OK CR 155, 105 P. 1118, 3 Okla. Crim. 246, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 251 (Okla. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error were tried and convicted for the offense of resisting-an executive officer in the performance of his duty, and judgment rendered that they be confined in the county jail of Seminole county for 30 days and each paj- a fine of $50, from which judgment they appealed to this court by filing with the clerk on October 23, 1909, their petition in error and case-made. On November 29th there was filed with the clerk of this court, on behalf of said plaintiffs in error, by their attorneys of record, a dismissal of said appeal. It is therefore ordered that said appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed, and the cause remanded to the county court of Seminole county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error were tried and convicted for the offense of resisting-an executive officer in the performance of his duty, and judgment rendered that they be confined in the county jail of Seminole county for 30 days and each paj- a fine of $50, from which judgment they appealed to this court by filing with the clerk on October 23, 1909, their petition in error and case-made. On November 29th there was filed with the clerk of this court, on behalf of said plaintiffs in error, by their attorneys of record, a dismissal of said appeal. It is therefore ordered that said appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed, and the cause remanded to the county court of Seminole county.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1909 OK CR 155, 105 P. 1118, 3 Okla. Crim. 246, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-oklacrimapp-1909.