Davis v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-1233 _____________________________
JOSEPH MICHAEL DAVIS,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
January 2, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the lower tribunal has ruled on Petitioner’s motion to transcribe hearing, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022); Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
ROWE, RAY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Joseph Michael Davis, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State of Florida (Davis v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.