Davis v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Lester Davis appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 24.035 [374]*374(2014) after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
471 S.W.3d 373 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.