Davis v. State

861 S.W.2d 830, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1542, 1993 WL 387197
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1760
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 5, 1993·No. No. 63392·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Willie Davis, appeals from a denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 861 S.W.2d 830, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1542, 1993 WL 387197 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

861 S.W.2d 830 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.