Davis v. State

792 S.W.2d 6, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 594, 1990 WL 44342
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 135
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 1990·No. No. 57255·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would [7]*7have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 792 S.W.2d 6, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 594, 1990 WL 44342 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

792 S.W.2d 6 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.