Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davis v. State

182 S.E. 399, 52 Ga. App. 74, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 41

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 2, 1935

Docket25162

StatusPublished

This text of 182 S.E. 399 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. State, 182 S.E. 399, 52 Ga. App. 74, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 41 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Guerry, J.

The defendant was convicted of receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. The burglary was shown. The plea of guilty of the principals was put in evidence, and a part of the property was shown to have been found in the possession of defendant. It became a question for the jury whether such possession was satisfactorily explained. The jury found against the defendant. No error of law is complained of. There was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guerry, J.

The defendant was convicted of receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen. The burglary was shown. The plea of guilty of the principals was put in evidence, and a part of the property was shown to have been found in the possession of defendant. It became a question for the jury whether such possession was satisfactorily explained. The jury found against the defendant. No error of law is complained of. There was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 S.E. 399, 52 Ga. App. 74, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-gactapp-1935.