Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davis v. State

153 S.E. 203, 41 Ga. App. 366, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 592

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1930

Docket20312

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 153 S.E. 203 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. State, 153 S.E. 203, 41 Ga. App. 366, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. '“Motions for new trials upon extraordinary grounds are not favored by the courts (Hays v. Westbrook, 96 Ga. 219, 22 S. E. 893), and a stricter rule is applied to such motions where they are based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence than to an ordinary motion based upon such a ground. Norman v. Goode, 121 Ga. 449 (49 S. E. 268).” Jackson v. State, 30 Ga. App. 669 (118 S. E. 763); Tyre v. State, 38 Ga. App. 206, 207 (143 S. E. 778).

2. The accused were convicted of voluntary manslaughter and the judgment overruling their motion for a new trial was affirmed by this court. Davis v. State, 40 Ga. App. 123 (149 S. E. 51). Subsequently they filed an extraordinary motion for a new trial, based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence of threats made by the deceased against them, but which were uncommunica.ted to them before the homicide. Such evidence would not have been admissible upon the trial if it had been offered, since it was not shown, otherwise than by the statements of the accused, that the deceased was the assailant at the time of the killing. Vaughn v. State, 88 Ga. 731 (2) (16 S. E. 64); Nix v. State, 120 Ga. 162 (2), 165 (47 S. E. 516); Pride v. State, 133 Ga. 438 (2) (66 S. E. 259); Ellison v. State, 21 Ga. App. 259 (2) (94 S. E. 253). Under this ruling, the grounds of the extraordinary motion for a new trial were without merit, and the court did not err in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. '“Motions for new trials upon extraordinary grounds are not favored by the courts (Hays v. Westbrook, 96 Ga. 219, 22 S. E. 893), and a stricter rule is applied to such motions where they are based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence than to an ordinary motion based upon such a ground. Norman v. Goode, 121 Ga. 449 (49 S. E. 268).” Jackson v. State, 30 Ga. App. 669 (118 S. E. 763); Tyre v. State, 38 Ga. App. 206, 207 (143 S. E. 778).

2. The accused were convicted of voluntary manslaughter and the judgment overruling their motion for a new trial was affirmed by this court. Davis v. State, 40 Ga. App. 123 (149 S. E. 51). Subsequently they filed an extraordinary motion for a new trial, based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence of threats made by the deceased against them, but which were uncommunica.ted to them before the homicide. Such evidence would not have been admissible upon the trial if it had been offered, since it was not shown, otherwise than by the statements of the accused, that the deceased was the assailant at the time of the killing. Vaughn v. State, 88 Ga. 731 (2) (16 S. E. 64); Nix v. State, 120 Ga. 162 (2), 165 (47 S. E. 516); Pride v. State, 133 Ga. 438 (2) (66 S. E. 259); Ellison v. State, 21 Ga. App. 259 (2) (94 S. E. 253). Under this ruling, the grounds of the extraordinary motion for a new trial were without merit, and the court did not err in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 S.E. 203, 41 Ga. App. 366, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-gactapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack