Davis v. State

143 S.E. 435, 38 Ga. App. 206, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 136
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1928
Docket18847
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 143 S.E. 435 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. State, 143 S.E. 435, 38 Ga. App. 206, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 136 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

A mere temporary loan of property, without hire or other benefit to the person lending, is not such a fiduciary bailment as would make the stealing or conversion of the property larceny after trust. Barksdale v. Slate, 28 Ga. App. 535 (112 S. E. 165).

Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant case, the defendant’s conviction of larceny after trust was unauthorized, and the refusal to grant him a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gammage v. State
88 S.E.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Silvers v. State
79 Ga. App. 223 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 S.E. 435, 38 Ga. App. 206, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-gactapp-1928.