Davis v. State
143 S.E. 435, 38 Ga. App. 206, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 136
Opinion
A mere temporary loan of property, without hire or other benefit to the person lending, is not such a fiduciary bailment as would make the stealing or conversion of the property larceny after trust. Barksdale v. Slate, 28 Ga. App. 535 (112 S. E. 165).
Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant case, the defendant’s conviction of larceny after trust was unauthorized, and the refusal to grant him a new trial was error.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 143 S.E. 435, 38 Ga. App. 206, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 136 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).
143 S.E. 435 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gammage v. State
88 S.E.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Silvers v. State
79 Ga. App. 223 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)