Davis v. State
This text of 72 S.E. 157 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Upon the trial of one charged with the offense of murder, the court did not err in instructing the jury as follows: “You will accept as correct, for your guidance in making up your verdict, the law as I shall give it to you in charge;” and “having applied the law to the evidence as you shall find it to be, you may render such verdict as the law demands at your hands.” Ridenhour v. State, 75 Ga. 382 (4); Malone v. State, 77 Ga. 767 (2); Berry v. State, 105 Ga. 683 (31 S. E. 592).
2. The court did not err in failing to charge that “On the trial of all criminal cases the jury shall be the judges of the law and facts.”
3. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 S.E. 157, 136 Ga. 798, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-ga-1911.