Davis v. State

134 So. 3d 1064, 2013 WL 5676340, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16652
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18022
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2013·No. No. 1D13-4291·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004) (reiterating that ha-[1065]*1065beas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions).

WOLF, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 134 So. 3d 1064, 2013 WL 5676340, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

134 So. 3d 1064 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)