Davis v. State
104 So. 3d 1279, 2013 WL 85377, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 316
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 2013·No. No. 4D12-2046·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. Hernandez v. State, — So.3d-(Fla.2012). In addition to being untimely, appellant’s motion is refuted by the record which demonstrates that the court advised appellant that his plea would subject him to deportation. This unequivocal warning that the plea “will” subject the defendant to deportation refutes his claim under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. [1280]*1280356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 104 So. 3d 1279, 2013 WL 85377, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 316 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
104 So. 3d 1279 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taveras v. State
264 So. 3d 358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Diana Pierre v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016
Pierre v. State
184 So. 3d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Reid v. State
133 So. 3d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)