Davis v. State

96 So. 3d 1116, 2012 WL 3870851, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14965
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 7, 2012·No. No. 1D11-1979·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted for four counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. All counts arose out of a single event during which Appellant possessed four different firearms. Appellant argues, and the State concedes, that the convictions violate double jeopardy principles. See Hill v. State, 711 So.2d 1221, 1224-25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (holding that “the prohibition against double jeopardy precludes more than one conviction for the possession at the same time of multiple firearms by a convicted felon”); see also Owens v. State, 681 So.2d 1194, 1194 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (reversing fifteen charges of possessing a firearm by a convicted felon as violating double jeopardy); Plowman v. State, 622 So.2d 91, 92 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (reversing three counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon as violating double jeopardy).

Accordingly, we vacate Appellant’s convictions and sentences for three counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, vacate the sentence for the one remaining count, and remand for resentenc-ing on that count. See Owens, 681 So.2d 1194.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 96 So. 3d 1116, 2012 WL 3870851, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14965 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

96 So. 3d 1116 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greenlee v. State
162 So. 3d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Verenzo Cartrell Green v. State of Mississippi
183 So. 3d 78 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2015)