Davis v. State

95 So. 3d 442, 2012 WL 3569708, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13849
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 2012·No. No. 1D11-6189·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of his convictions and sentences for battery and felony battery by strangulation. Appellate counsel filed an initial brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), representing that no good faith argument could be made that reversible error occurred below, but identifying technical errors with the imposition of costs and fines at sentencing and a scrivener’s error in Appellant’s Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet. Counsel preserved these errors in a timely filed motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). We reject counsel’s arguments that certain costs were improperly imposed. However, Appellant’s scoresheet incorrectly reflects that the date of his primary offense was June 12, 2008. The date of Appellant’s primary offense was July 17, 2010.

Accordingly, we affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences but remand to the trial court for correction of his scoresheet.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 95 So. 3d 442, 2012 WL 3569708, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13849 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

95 So. 3d 442 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharpe v. State
115 So. 3d 1021 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)