Davis v. State

22 So. 3d 827, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17713, 2009 WL 4061335
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 953 So. 2d 612
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 25, 2009·No. 3D09-2306·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s July 21, 2009 order denying his second motion for rehearing. Appellant’s first motion for rehearing was denied and furnished to appellant on April 6, 2009. Because the appellant’s unauthorized, successive motion for rehearing did not suspend the rendition time for review of the order denying his motion for 3.850 relief, the present appeal, filed several months after the denial of the “first” motion for rehearing, is hereby dismissed as untimely. See Dominguez v. Barakat, 609 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 22 So. 3d 827, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17713, 2009 WL 4061335 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

22 So. 3d 827 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dominguez v. Barakat
609 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)