Davis v. State

855 So. 2d 1201, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15234, 2003 WL 22316559
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 775 So. 2d 427
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 2003·No. No. 5D02-1935·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.1 See Wright v. State, 857 So.2d 861, 2003 WL 21511313 (Fla. July 3, 2003) (“Habeas corpus should not be used as a vehicle for presenting issues which should have been raised at trial and on appeal or in postconviction proceedings”).

SHARP, W., THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 855 So. 2d 1201, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15234, 2003 WL 22316559 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

855 So. 2d 1201 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
857 So. 2d 861 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Davis v. State
852 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)