Davis v. State
821 So. 2d 1181, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10299, 2002 WL 1626109
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 745 So. 2d 499 →
Opinion
As we conclude that the record fully supports the trial court’s determination that defense counsel’s performance did not fall outside the boundaries of reasonable professional conduct as contemplated by Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we affirm the denial of the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 821 So. 2d 1181, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10299, 2002 WL 1626109 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
821 So. 2d 1181 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)