Davis v. State
802 So. 2d 484, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18266, 2001 WL 1644970
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 736 So. 2d 27 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). We also certify the same question as in Major:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 802 So. 2d 484, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18266, 2001 WL 1644970 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
802 So. 2d 484 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Major v. State
790 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)