Davis v. State

800 So. 2d 656, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15549, 2001 WL 1346425
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 2001·No. No. 2D01-3614·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Merlán Davis appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Davis’s direct appeal is currently pending. Thus, the trial court was without jurisdiction to rule on Davis’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). A prematurely filed motion to correct illegal sentence should be dismissed by a trial court and may be refiled after the direct appeal is final. Phillibert v. State, 768 So.2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). In the alternative, a trial court may stay the motion pending the resolution of the direct appeal. Id. Accordingly, we vacate the order of the trial court and remand with instructions either to dismiss Davis’s 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to his right to refile after his direct appeal is final or to stay the motion pending the outcome of the direct appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 800 So. 2d 656, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15549, 2001 WL 1346425 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

800 So. 2d 656 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
953 So. 2d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)