Davis v. State
679 So. 2d 1310, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10255, 1996 WL 551459
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 627 So. 2d 112 →
Opinion
We remand and direct that the “crime lab trust fund fee” be deleted from the sentence imposed in this case. This cost was not pronounced orally at the sentencing hearing. Stevens v. State, 651 So.2d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The appellant need not be present for such purpose. See Warren v. State, 661 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We affirm in all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 679 So. 2d 1310, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10255, 1996 WL 551459 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
679 So. 2d 1310 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stevens v. State
651 So. 2d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Warren v. State
661 So. 2d 1318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)