Davis v. State

473 So. 2d 46, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1850, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14734
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1985·No. No. 85-89·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal stems from an order revoking the defendant’s probation. We have reviewed the record in this respect and find no error. It appears, however, that in pronouncing sentence, the trial court failed to award the defendant credit for time served in the county jail. As the First District stated in Miller v. State, 297 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974):

When a defendant is held in jail to answer for multiple charges or cases, the first sentencing judge who sentences him to jail or to the state prison shall give him credit on the sentence or sentences in that case for all time spent in jail between the date of his arrest in that case and the date of such sentence even though the defendant may have also been held to answer for other charges during some or all of such time.

Miller, 297 So.2d at 38.

Accordingly, we remand this case to allow the trial court to comply with the procedure in Miller and to properly credit the defendant’s sentence. In so doing, the court should also specify the exact dates of the defendant’s incarceration on the various charges for the purpose of developing an adequate record in the event further review becomes necessary. In all other respects, the order being appealed is affirmed.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 473 So. 2d 46, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1850, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14734 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

473 So. 2d 46 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
88 So. 3d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)