Davis v. State

380 So. 2d 546, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15636
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 346 So. 2d 141
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1980·No. No. 79-1035·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, but we remand the case for correction of the written revocation order. The affidavit of violation of probation charged that appellant violated conditions (1), (2), (5), and (8). At the hearing on the affidavit, the state elected to drop those violations concerning condition (2). Since at the hearing the court did not find that appellant had violated condition (2), it should now remove any reference to that condition from its order. Brouillett v. State, 373 So.2d 449 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).

GRIMES, C. J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 380 So. 2d 546, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15636 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

380 So. 2d 546 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brouillett v. State
373 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)