Davis v. State
164 So. 2d 37, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4257
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3950 →
Opinion
The lower court held that the motion filed under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 did not show a prima facie right to relief, said motion did not contain allegations of fact which expressly or implicitly negate waiver of the right to counsel.
We affirm under authority of King v. State, Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 440; Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771; Wilson v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 164 So.2d 43; and Dixon v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 163 So.2d 771.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 164 So. 2d 37, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).
164 So. 2d 37 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sampson v. State
158 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Dixon v. State
163 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
King v. State
157 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Wilson v. State
164 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)