Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Davis v. State

720 So. 2d 242, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 571, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2108, 1998 WL 750916

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 29, 1998

DocketNo. 93135

StatusPublished

This text of 720 So. 2d 242 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. State, 720 So. 2d 242, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 571, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2108, 1998 WL 750916 (Fla. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Davis v. State, 710 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), which certified conflict with the opinion in Galloway v. State, 680 So.2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), concerning the issue of whether additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm during the commission of a crime may be added to a defendant’s sentencing score where the defendant is convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently resolved this conflict in White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998), wherein we held that it is error for a trial court to assess additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm where the sole underlying crime is carrying a concealed firearm or possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm during the commission of a crime may not be assessed against a defendant’s sentencing score where the carrying or possessing of a firearm is the essential element of the underlying offense. Id. at 443-44. In so holding, we approved the opinion in Galloway.

Therefore, in accordance with our decision in White, we quash the decision below.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. WELLS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Davis v. State, 710 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), which certified conflict with the opinion in Galloway v. State, 680 So.2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), concerning the issue of whether additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm during the commission of a crime may be added to a defendant’s sentencing score where the defendant is convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently resolved this conflict in White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998), wherein we held that it is error for a trial court to assess additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm where the sole underlying crime is carrying a concealed firearm or possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. In other words, additional sentencing points for carrying or possessing a firearm during the commission of a crime may not be assessed against a defendant’s sentencing score where the carrying or possessing of a firearm is the essential element of the underlying offense. Id. at 443-44. In so holding, we approved the opinion in Galloway.

Therefore, in accordance with our decision in White, we quash the decision below.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. WELLS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

720 So. 2d 242, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 571, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2108, 1998 WL 750916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-fla-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack