Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Davis v. State

122 So. 579, 97 Fla. 987

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 27, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 122 So. 579 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. State, 122 So. 579, 97 Fla. 987 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs in error were convicted' of the larceny of a cow. The contention made in their behalf is that there was no evidence of “taking and carrying away.” There was, however, sufficient evidence to show that the cow was butchered at the place where she was shot, and the operations necessary to prepare the beef for market. *988 almost completed, when the plaintiffs in error were discovered and ran away. The judgment of conviction is affirmed on authority of Driggers v. State, 118 So. R. 20.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs in error were convicted' of the larceny of a cow. The contention made in their behalf is that there was no evidence of “taking and carrying away.” There was, however, sufficient evidence to show that the cow was butchered at the place where she was shot, and the operations necessary to prepare the beef for market. *988 almost completed, when the plaintiffs in error were discovered and ran away. The judgment of conviction is affirmed on authority of Driggers v. State, 118 So. R. 20.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 So. 579, 97 Fla. 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-fla-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack