Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Davis v. State

16 S.W.3d 556, 341 Ark. 451, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 265

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 345 Ark. 161 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 25, 2000·No. CR 00-528·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Don William Davis, by his attorney, Joel M. Huggins, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Don William Davis, by his attorney, Joel M. Huggins, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Davis v. State, 16 S.W.3d 556, 341 Ark. 451, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 265 (Ark. 2000).

Pincite

16 S.W.3d 556 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related