Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Davis v. State

750 S.W.2d 60, 295 Ark. 693

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJune 6, 1988

DocketRC 88-31

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 750 S.W.2d 60 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. State, 750 S.W.2d 60, 295 Ark. 693 (Ark. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Howard D. Davis, by his attorney, has filed a second motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert Meurer, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Howard D. Davis, by his attorney, has filed a second motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert Meurer, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

750 S.W.2d 60, 295 Ark. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-ark-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack