Davis v. State

152 So. 612, 26 Ala. App. 63, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 13
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 30, 1934
Docket3 Div. 737.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 So. 612 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. State, 152 So. 612, 26 Ala. App. 63, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 13 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The^prosecution was begun by affidavit and warrant returnable to. the county court, where the cause was tried, the defendant ■convicted, and an appeal was taken to the circuit court.

The statute requires the solicitor to make a brief statement of the cause of complaint, to be filed by him and on which the case is tried de novo in the circuit court. Code 1923, § 3843.

In this record no such statement appears, and for that reason the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Moss v. State, 42 Ala. 546; Howard v. State, 17 Ala. App. 9, 81 So. 345.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
148 So. 2d 653 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 612, 26 Ala. App. 63, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-alactapp-1934.