Davis v. State

152 So. 612, 26 Ala. App. 63, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 13
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 1934·No. 3 Div. 737.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The^prosecution was begun by affidavit and warrant returnable to. the county court, where the cause was tried, the defendant ■convicted, and an appeal was taken to the circuit court.

The statute requires the solicitor to make a brief statement of the cause of complaint, to be filed by him and on which the case is tried de novo in the circuit court. Code 1923, § 3843.

In this record no such statement appears, and for that reason the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Moss v. State, 42 Ala. 546; Howard v. State, 17 Ala. App. 9, 81 So. 345.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 152 So. 612, 26 Ala. App. 63, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 13 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

152 So. 612 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
148 So. 2d 653 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1963)