Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Davis v. State

Davis v. State

61 So. 483, 7 Ala. App. 122, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 34
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 1913·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

WALKER, P. J.

The motion made in this case to strike that part ■ of the transcript which sets out the venire for, and the organization of, the petit juries is granted, as no question in reference to those matters was raised in the trial court. — Redman v. State, 8 Ala. App., 62 South. 992.

[124]*124Following previous rulings in this state, it must be held that the instruction embodied in written charge 4, requested by the defendant, was one which he ivas entitled to have given, and that the court was in error in refusing to give it. — Gainey v. State, 141 Ala. 72, 37 South. 355; Whitaker v. State, 106 Ala. 30, 17 South. 456.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 61 So. 483, 7 Ala. App. 122, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 34 (Ala. Ct. App. 1913).

61 So. 483 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilbanks v. State
266 So. 2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1971)
Commons v. State
52 So. 2d 415 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)
Bradford v. State
50 So. 2d 286 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)
Bankhead v. State
32 So. 2d 814 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1947)
Mathis v. State
73 So. 122 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)