Davis v. State

601 So. 2d 1154, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 455, 1992 WL 171722
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 805
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 24, 1992·No. CR-91-494·Published

Opinion

MONTIEL, Judge.

Lee Ernest Davis, Jr., filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Jefferson Circuit Court. The petition was denied by the circuit court. This court has consistently held that when a petition styled as a petition for writ of habeas corpus is filed and the allegations raised in the petition are cognizable in a proceeding under Rule 32, the cause should be entertained in the court of original conviction and the petitioner should be given the opportunity to file a proper post-conviction petition as required by Rule 32.6(a). Drayton v. State, 600 So.2d 1088 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) (and cases cited therein). Therefore, this case is remanded to the circuit court with directions that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be returned to the appellant so that he can have the opportunity to file a proper Rule 32 petition.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 601 So. 2d 1154, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 455, 1992 WL 171722 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 1154 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drayton v. State
600 So. 2d 1088 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)