Davis v. Stanford

Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Stanford

127 F. App'x 680

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 10, 2005

Docket04-7911

StatusUnpublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 127 F. App'x 680 (Davis v. Stanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Stanford, 127 F. App'x 680 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have *681 reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Stanford, No. CA-03-1166-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 26, 2004). We also deny Daws’ motion for summary reversal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have *681 reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Stanford, No. CA-03-1166-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 26, 2004). We also deny Daws’ motion for summary reversal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 F. App'x 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-stanford-ca4-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack