Davis v. Stalder
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-30572 Summary Calendar
LIONELL J. DAVIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus,
RICHARD L. STALDER; C. MARTIN LENSING, Warden; C. DAVID RAGLAND; C. SCROPSHIRE, LT.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-2024 - - - - - - - - - -
October 3, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Because Lionell J. Davis (#118554) makes no argument that
challenges the district court’s dismissal of his civil-rights
action, his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)
on appeal is DENIED. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586
(5th Cir. 1982). Because only Davis signed the notice of appeal,
he is the only appellant moving for IFP. Carter v. Stalder, 60
F.3d 238, 239 (5th Cir. 1995). The appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th
Cir. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-30572 - 2 -
IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Stalder (Davis v. Stalder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.