Davis v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Missouri Court of Appeals

Davis v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS

273 S.W.3d 575, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1762, 2008 WL 5455380

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 30, 2008·No. ED 91233·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis Public Schools (“Employer”) appeals two decisions of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming two separate awards of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) allowing compensation on William Davis’s (“Claimant”) occupational disease claims. We find that the Commission did not err in affirming the awards.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis Public Schools (“Employer”) appeals two decisions of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming two separate awards of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) allowing compensation on William Davis’s (“Claimant”) occupational disease claims. We find that the Commission did not err in affirming the awards.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Davis v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 273 S.W.3d 575, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1762, 2008 WL 5455380 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

273 S.W.3d 575 (Davis v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.