Davis v. Smyth

167 F.2d 221, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2425
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 1948
DocketNo. 5714
StatusPublished

This text of 167 F.2d 221 (Davis v. Smyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Smyth, 167 F.2d 221, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2425 (4th Cir. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denying a writ of habeas corpus to the appellant. Appellant, Willie Davis, is being held in the custody of appellee under sentences of the codrts of the State of Virginia for housebreaking, felonious assault with deadly weapons and three separate sentences for escapes.

Appellant, in March, 1945, filed in the Law and Equity Court for the City of Richmond, Virginia, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. A rule to show cause was issued, affidavits and counter-affidavits were filed, oral argument was had. This court later discharged the rule to show cause and declined to issue the writ on the ground “that the petitioner has failed to show probable cause to believe that he is detained without lawful authority.”

The Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia denied an application for a writ of error and affirmed the judgment below with a recital: “the judgment * * * having been maturely considered and a transcript of the record seen and inspected, the Court being of opinion that the said judgment is plainly right, * *

Davis, then, without seeking certiorari from the United States Supreme Court, filed a petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.1 There was a rule to show cause, then a motion to dismiss, which was granted on the ground that Davis [222]*222had not exhausted his state remedies since he had not sought certiorari from the United States Supreme Court to review the action of the State Courts of Virginia. Upon appeal to us from this decision, the judgment of the District Court was affirmed. Davis v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 155 F.2d 3.

Next, Davis filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. After a rule to show cause, that Court, on June 6, 1946, dismissed the petition. Davis then applied to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari and this application was, on December 6, 1946, denied. Davis v. Smyth, 329 U.S. 789, 67 S.Ct. 353.

In October, 1947, Davis filed his petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, this petition being identical with the petition dismissed by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia on June 6, 1946. On October 29, 1947, the District Court dismissed this petition. The case is before us on appeal from this order of dismissal by the District Court.

This recital makes it clear that (including the instant appeal) applications for habeas corpus on the part of Davis have been once before the United States Supreme Court, twice before the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, twice before us, twice before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and once before the Law and Equity Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed on the authority of White v. Ragen, 324 U.S. 760, 65 S.Ct. 978, 89 L.Ed. 1348; House v. Mayo, 324 U.S. 42, 65 S.Ct. 517, 89 L.Ed. 739; Stonebreaker v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 163 F.2d 498; Bernard v. Brady, 4 Cir., 164 F.2d 881; and Edmondson v. Swenson, 4 Cir., 165 F.2d 432.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

House v. Mayo
324 U.S. 42 (Supreme Court, 1945)
White v. Ragen
324 U.S. 760 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Stonebreaker v. Smyth
163 F.2d 498 (Fourth Circuit, 1947)
Davis v. Smyth
155 F.2d 3 (Fourth Circuit, 1946)
Bernard v. Brady
164 F.2d 881 (Fourth Circuit, 1947)
Edmondson v. Swenson
165 F.2d 432 (Fourth Circuit, 1948)
Davis v. Smyth
329 U.S. 789 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Davis v. Smyth
65 F. Supp. 313 (E.D. Virginia, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 F.2d 221, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-smyth-ca4-1948.