Davis v. Smith

998 So. 2d 1212, 2009 WL 187690
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 2009
Docket4D07-3491
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 998 So. 2d 1212 (Davis v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Smith, 998 So. 2d 1212, 2009 WL 187690 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

998 So.2d 1212 (2009)

Jermaine T. DAVIS, Appellant,
v.
Michelle SMITH f/k/a Michelle Harrington, Appellee.

No. 4D07-3491.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 28, 2009.

Troy W. Klein of Troy W. Klein, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Michelle Smith f/k/a Michelle Harrington, Litchfield Park, Arizona, pro se.

GOLDENBERG, RENEE, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment on petitions for modification. We affirm except as to the modification of the visitation schedule and payment of transportation costs.

One year prior to the filing of the parties' supplemental petitions for modification, the parties entered into their Supplemental Agreement Regarding Visitation which specifically addressed these issues, resolving earlier disputes. We find that a substantial change in circumstances warranting the modification of the parties' Supplemental Agreement regarding the visitation schedule and payment of transportation costs has not been shown by competent substantial evidence, nor did the court's order reflect such a finding. The parties agreed at trial only to a modification of the location for exchange of the child. Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928 (Fla.2005).

Affirmed in Part and Reversed in Part.

GROSS, C.J. and POLEN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DE LOS RIOS v. State
998 So. 2d 1212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
998 So. 2d 1212, 2009 WL 187690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-smith-fladistctapp-2009.