Davis v. Smith
This text of 19 F. 823 (Davis v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This bill, for profits and damages against an infringer of the plaintiff’s patent, was filed one day before the patent expired. The defendant demurs for want of equity; and Ms demurrer must be sustained. No equitable discovery or relief is sought by the bill beyond or different from that which is usual in ordinary patent causes. The plaintiff could not expect the court to grant a restraining order, which must expire before it could, by reasonable diligence, be served, nor was one prayed for. An injunction was impossible for want of time to notify the defendant. The ease, therefore, comes within Root v. Ry. Co. 105 U. S. 189; Burdell v. Comstock, 15 Fed. Rep. 395; Betts v. Gallais, L. R. 10 Eq. 392.
Demurrer sustained. Bill dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F. 823, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-smith-circtdma-1884.