Davis v. Smith

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 415 F. App'x 483
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2011·No. 10-7520·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7520

RICKY GLENDALL DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TIMOTHY A. SMITH, Patrol Officer, Suffolk Police Department; J.R. RIVERA, Patrol Officer, Suffolk Police Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:09-cv-00274-HEH)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Glendall Davis, Appellant Pro Se. D. Rossen S. Greene, PENDER & COWARD, Suffolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ricky Glendall Davis, a state prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Davis v. Smith, No. 3:09-cv-00274-HEH

(E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Smith, (4th Cir. 2011).

Davis v. Smith (Davis v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related