Davis v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Smith

108 F. App'x 778

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 2004·No. No. 04-6890, 04-6951·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Hencely Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the records and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v. Smith, No. CA-04-43-1; Davis v. Brewer, No. CA-03-1189-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 29, 2004 & entered Mar. 30, 2004; Apr. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the [779]*779facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Hencely Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the records and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v. Smith, No. CA-04-43-1; Davis v. Brewer, No. CA-03-1189-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 29, 2004 & entered Mar. 30, 2004; Apr. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the [779]*779facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Davis v. Smith, 108 F. App'x 778 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

108 F. App'x 778 (Davis v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related