Davis v. Skinner
85 S.E. 970, 16 Ga. App. 693, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 200
This text of 85 S.E. 970 (Davis v. Skinner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davis v. Skinner, 85 S.E. 970, 16 Ga. App. 693, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 200 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
There was some evidence upon which the court, sitting both as judge and jury, was authorized to find for the defendant, and in such a ease the Court of Appeals is without jurisdiction to disturb the finding, even,though the evidence be weak and unsatisfactory, when the motion for a new trial contains no other assignment of error than the usual general grounds. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. Ham
50 S.E.2d 831 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
85 S.E. 970, 16 Ga. App. 693, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-skinner-gactapp-1915.