Davis v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Davis v. Singletary

677 So. 2d 1007, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8657, 1996 WL 464368

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 14, 1996

DocketNo. 96-1622

StatusPublished

This text of 677 So. 2d 1007 (Davis v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Singletary, 677 So. 2d 1007, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8657, 1996 WL 464368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Sherry Davis’ belated appeal is allowed pursuant to the mailbox rule. Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992). On consideration of the merits of the appeal of her second motion for post-conviction relief, including her “Motion for Correction of Sentence, or in the Alternative, Motion to Vacate Judgment and Sentence,” the trial court’s order of denial is affirmed. See Madrigal v. State, 545 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Sherry Davis’ belated appeal is allowed pursuant to the mailbox rule. Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992). On consideration of the merits of the appeal of her second motion for post-conviction relief, including her “Motion for Correction of Sentence, or in the Alternative, Motion to Vacate Judgment and Sentence,” the trial court’s order of denial is affirmed. See Madrigal v. State, 545 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 So. 2d 1007, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8657, 1996 WL 464368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack