Davis v. Simons

Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Simons

667 F. App'x 50

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2016·No. No. 15-7954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Minyard Cass Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Simons, No. 2:15-cv-00175-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. signed Nov. 12, 2015; entered Nov. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Minyard Cass Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Simons, No. 2:15-cv-00175-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. signed Nov. 12, 2015; entered Nov. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Davis v. Simons, 667 F. App'x 50 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 50 (Davis v. Simons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related