Davis v. Shinseki

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. Shinseki. Read the opinion of the Court — 401 F. App'x 533
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 11, 2011·No. 2011-7063·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mniteb ~tate%

HAROLD V. DAVIS, Claimant-Appellant,

v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.

2011-7063

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 10-1771, Judge Mary J. Schoelen.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Harold V. Davis files a motion seeking dismissal of his appeal to this court, in response to a previous order directing the parties to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed.

Upon consideration thereof, DAVIS v. DVA 2

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) All other pending motions are moot.

FOR THE COURT

MAR 11 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOIl THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Harold V. Davis Renee Gerber, Esq. MAR 11 lOll s23 JANtWRBAty CLEII< Issued As A Mandate: MAR 11 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Shinseki, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Davis v. Shinseki (Davis v. Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.