Davis v. Sherwood Village Cooperative "C", Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis v. Sherwood Village Cooperative "C", Inc.

55 A.D.2d 925, 390 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10175

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 925 (Davis v. Sherwood Village Cooperative "C", Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Sherwood Village Cooperative "C", Inc., 55 A.D.2d 925, 390 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia to declare that the defendant Sherwood Village Cooperative "C”, Inc., waived a certain option to purchase plaintiffs’ stock, (1) plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 17, 1975, as denied their motion for partial summary judgment and granted the branch of defendants’ cross motion which sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against defendant Guirdanella and (2) defendant Sherwood Village appeals from so much of the said order as denied the branch of defendants’ cross motion which sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the memorandum decision of Mr. Justice Ruskin at Special Term. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia to declare that the defendant Sherwood Village Cooperative "C”, Inc., waived a certain option to purchase plaintiffs’ stock, (1) plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 17, 1975, as denied their motion for partial summary judgment and granted the branch of defendants’ cross motion which sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against defendant Guirdanella and (2) defendant Sherwood Village appeals from so much of the said order as denied the branch of defendants’ cross motion which sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the memorandum decision of Mr. Justice Ruskin at Special Term. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 925, 390 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-sherwood-village-cooperative-c-inc-nyappdiv-1977.