Davis v. Sherron

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Davis v. Sherron

7 F. Cas. 176, 1 Cranch 287

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedMarch 15, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 F. Cas. 176 (Davis v. Sherron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Sherron, 7 F. Cas. 176, 1 Cranch 287 (circtddc 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

instructed the jury, that words spoken of one of the plaintiffs only, cannot be given in evidence to support the declaration. And that words spoken by each of the defendants separately, and not in the presence of each other, cannot be given in evidence upon this declaration, which charges a joint speaking.

Nonsuit. Motion to reinstate, refused.

Robert McMunn was attached as a witness. The attachment was served in the gallery of the court-room. THE COURT said that the service was not good,-being in court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

instructed the jury, that words spoken of one of the plaintiffs only, cannot be given in evidence to support the declaration. And that words spoken by each of the defendants separately, and not in the presence of each other, cannot be given in evidence upon this declaration, which charges a joint speaking.

Nonsuit. Motion to reinstate, refused.

Robert McMunn was attached as a witness. The attachment was served in the gallery of the court-room. THE COURT said that the service was not good,-being in court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 F. Cas. 176, 1 Cranch 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-sherron-circtddc-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack